Twitter Trends on Trend Central

Trend Central is a great site that covers up and coming people and trends in music, lifestyle, entertainment, and media. Today their topic is what’s new with Twitter, including:

Twitter Branding: Want to check out how the competition is using Twitter? A new directory of tweeting brands, Twitter Tracker, compiles real-time updates from companies using the service, such as Whole Foods, JetBlue, and Starbucks.

Check out the full list here. You can also sign up to have their short trend newsletters e-mailed to you daily.

How TSTC Publishing Uses Twitter

Since our article on how book publishers should be using Twitter, some other publishers have chimed in with their own experiences. Here’s Mark Long, publisher of TSTC Publishing in Texas, on how Twitter can help small companies track larger trends:

For me, I think the best part of Twitter is being able to engage in the ongoing ‘conversation’ about the publishing industry . . . something I wouldn’t be able to do face to face as we’re based in Waco, Texas. We follow bookstores, bookstore buyers, sales reps, freelance consultants, and, of course, other publishers. It’s a great way to stay in the loop of what’s happening in the industry all over the country (and beyond) and not just working in a vacuum in our own office. And, it’s nice to be able to drop these folks a line periodically to ask (and answer on our own end as well) questions that crop up that are pretty specific that nobody we know around here could address.


“Plus, given that I was really interested in publishing long before I began working in it, I think Twitter is a good way to get a sense of the day-to-day realities of the industry. (It’s certainly not long martini lunches . . . although we do eat at On The Border pretty regularly with folks.) I was a college English teacher for about 10 years and I like Twittering in the sense that it gives our graphics and editorial interns an idea of what goes on outside of the specific work they do for us as well so there is that teaching/informing aspect to it.”

Follow TSTC Publishing on Twitter at @tstcpublishing and read the company’s blog here.

Twitter Isn’t Stupid–But Publishers Need to Be Smart about Using It. Here’s How.

Twitter is really the stupidest thing in the world,” Chris Brogan, blogger and social media expert, said in his Blogging and Social Media panel at the O’Reilly Tools of Change for Publishers conference in February. But he didn’t mean it. At first blush, Twitter does seem like a dumb idea. It describes itself as “a service for friends, family, and co-workers to communicate and stay connected through the exchange of quick, frequent messages. People write short updates, often called ‘tweets,’ of 140 characters or fewer. These messages are posted to your profile or your blog, sent to your followers, and are searchable on Twitter search.” Your followers are the people who sign up to receive your tweets, and you are following anyone whose tweets you sign up to receive.

A February 2009 Compete.com study found that Twitter is the third largest social-networking site, after Facebook and MySpace. Many people and companies have ventured their ways on in the past year; it was ranked #22 in 2008. It has nearly six million users and 55 million monthly visits. Meanwhile, people are spending less time on MySpace and visiting it less often, as Twitter use surges. It’s easy to imagine it climbing to #2 in 2010. A February Pew Internet & American Life study reported that 11% of online American adults use a service like Twitter, an increase of nearly 50% since May 2008. Anyone who’s read their friends’ mundane Facebook status updates may question the value of a social network devoted solely to status updates.

But Twitter has proven that status updates can go beyond writing about what you had for breakfast. Think of it as digital word of mouth. “I think of Twitter as the new phone,” said Brogan. “I use it to talk to people and get business. I don’t use it to talk about my cat.” Yet in a February Abrams Research Social Media Survey of “over 200 social media leaders” from the U.S. and Canada,” 40% of respondents chose Twitter as the #1 social media service for businesses, with LinkedIn at a distant second. One survey respondent described Twitter as “the quickest way I’ve seen to spread information virally to a wide scope of people attached in a lot of random ways,” while another said it’s the “best way to bridge the personal-professional gap. Once people care about YOU the person, they care about YOU the brand.”

“I pay a lot of attention to what is going on in social media, since publishing as an industry will grow ever more reliant on the tools it develops,” says Richard Nash, formerly of Soft Skull and Counterpoint. “And in order to understand, you must use.” Here’s how and why according to the pros, book publishers should be using Twitter now.

Developing Your Twitter Presence

The number-one tip from people we talked to: Publishers shouldn’t be afraid to get personal on Twitter, and their tweets shouldn’t sound like marketing. “The best people using Twitter are the ones who talk back to people, not just the people who are talking about their dumb stuff,” says Brogan. He recommends looking at companies whose Twitter presence you like and emulating them. Ron Hogan, founder of Beatrice.com and a producer of writers’ workshops and conferences, agrees: “The publishers that use Twitter best are the ones who let the person running the account put a personal spin on their posts, not just announcing every press clipping or YouTube clip that comes down the pike.” In fact, rather than having one company Twitter account with the company’s name, it may be better for employees to have individual accounts. “Publishers should empower and encourage ALL of their employees to Twitter, and to talk about what makes them truly jazzed to work with books. There are huge transparency issues publishers have to work through to become comfortable with this, but I believe it would be worth it.”

“I do not have a separate personal account,” says Heather Adams, Director of Publicity at Thomas Nelson. “I don’t distinguish between my personal and professional tweets. My career is a significant part of my life and intertwining it with my life as a mother, wife, community volunteer, etc. is important. It’s a part of my total makeup. I also believe this allows my followers to learn more about the person behind the updates.”

“I like the [publishers on Twitter] that aren’t sales-y—it’s not just every tweet on ‘what a fab book we just released.’ There’s a transparency online that publishers, if they are going to use social media, need to adhere to,” says Penny Sansevieri of Author Marketing Experts. “I like to see posts on stuff they’re working on, industry news, new things going on in their offices. This gives their operation a ‘voice.’ Best of all, it gives me the inside scoop on new titles.”

“We’re still experimenting, but at the moment we’re just using it to connect with readers,” says Anna Rafferty, Digital Marketing Director at Penguin UK. “We want to hear from them, ask them questions, let them know what we’re up to, and generally keep in touch. I hope it will be a tool for inspiration and will prompt unexpected reading, but more than anything it’s about Penguin being a friendly, interesting brand.”

Using Twitter to Connect with Your Audience and Gain Recognition

The Pew social media survey found that Twitter users as a group are much more likely than the general population to use wireless devices like cell phones, laptops, and handhelds for Internet access. They use those devices to get their news. “For many Twitter users, learning about and sharing relevant and recent nuggets of information is a primary utility of the service,” says the report. “While Twitter users are just as likely as others to consume media on any given day, they are more likely to consume it on mobile devices and less likely to engage with news via more traditional outlets.” In addition, publishers trying to spread the word about their books via blogs should take heart in the fact that many of the people using Twitter are the same people reading and writing blogs. Pew found that 21% of Twitter users had read someone else’s blog “yesterday,” 57% had ever read a blog (as compared to 29% of the population who is online but not on Twitter), and 29% had their own blogs.

Making a connection with a Twitter user has an impact far beyond the initial conversation if she goes on to blog about you, or if her followers on Twitter see her interactions with you. If you already have a blog, posting your Twitter handle on it and letting your Twitter followers know when interesting new posts go up increases the ripple effect. Last fall, Thomas Nelson launched Book Review Bloggers, which allows bloggers to receive free copies of Nelson books in exchange for 200-word book reviews (positive or negative) posted on their blogs and on any consumer retail website (like Amazon). “It is amazing how much overlap we find between bloggers and Twitterers,” says Lindsay Nobles, Nelson’s Director of Corporate Communications. “When we share information about new books available, we find a major surge in interest.”

Twitter is also a free research tool for publishers. “Publishers should set up Twitter searches on keywords within the topics or subject areas in which they publish,” says Chris Webb, Associate Publisher of Wiley’s Professional and Trade division and head of its European Technology Publishing Group. “We absolutely should be listening for people talking about our brands, our book series, and our products. Listening provides opportunities for publishers to engage people in conversations where we can provide value—a solution to a problem, a new resource for a reader, or a new book to a new customer.”

And these conversations are a great way to influence the influencers. “At this stage, Twitter’s still small enough that it’s useful for seeding news to influential people, whatever your industry,” says Ryan Chapman, Internet Marketing Coordinator at Macmillan. “I’ve used it informally to give Macmillan books away, as other publishers have, and any conduit between customers and publishers can only help us.”

Oh, Yeah—It Leads to Increased Sales

“Publishers should not think about Twitter initially as a way to drive book sales. Instead, it’s a way for them to connect and communicate with readers in a way that is foreign at first,” says Webb. “If we [are part of the community], the opportunities to introduce people to the books we publish will present themselves naturally. But we have to listen for them as part of the ongoing conversation….Having said that, Twitter can drive sales. It has been widely reported that Dell [computers] drove an additional $1 million in revenues in 18 months via its Twitter account.”

“I’ve gotten a lot of business from Twitter. People follow my tweets, love what I have to say and book a consultation,” says Sansevieri. “It’s a permission-based way to get and stay in front of folks, and if you use it right, it can really be a revenue generator. The key is to offer help first and ask for help (or business) later. Don’t lead with your wallet.”

Nash agrees, saying that people who follow publishers “are likely themselves to be folks who influence others on if and which books to buy. So I do actually see it as part of a customer service paradigm. You’re servicing a community to try to build.”

And remember to keep an eye out for new authors to sign. “I’m counting down the days,” says Chapman, “until someone’s offered a book deal off of his or her Twitter stream.”

Book View, March 2009

PEOPLE

This past month brought more layoffs, but some hires as well. We’ll start with those, but see below for layoffs, and where available, contact info.

Robert Riger has been named Director of the Pimsleur Language Program at Simon & Schuster Audio, succeeding Whit Waterbury. He was most recently Associate Publisher of SparkNotes/B&N.

Luke Dempsey has joined the Random House Publishing Group as Editorial Director, Nonfiction, Ballantine. Most recently, he was EIC of Penguin’s Hudson Street Press.

Marcy Goot has been named Executive Director of Marketing at Kaplan. She was VP of Marketing at National Lampoon.

Becky Cole has been named Senior Editor at Plume. She had been at Broadway Books.

Mary-Alice Moore has joined Highlights for Children as Executive Editor for new products. She was most recently with Scholastic@Home and HarperCollins.

Cathy Hemming has moved her eponymous literary agency to McCormick & Williams.

Simon Green has joined CAA in New York as an agent. He may be reached at sgreen [at] caa.com.

HarperCollins’s February layoffs affected an indeterminate number of people. To recap, Collins was merged into Harper. Collins President and Pulisher Steve Ross (slross58 [at] gmail.com) and several other members of the Collins group were laid off. They include Nancy Miller, VP and Executive Editor at Collins; Paul Olsewski, VP Senior Director of Publicity (paulolsewski [at] yahoo.com); Larry Hughes, Senior Director of Publicity (lhcommun [at] comcast.net); Caroline Sutton, Executive Editor (ces55eea [at] gmail.com); Gillian Blake, Executive Editor at Collins (gillianblake1 [at] gmail.com); and Nina Olmsted, SVP Sales.

Lisa Gallagher (lisagallaghernyc [at] gmail.com), SVP and Publisher of William Morrow, has also left. Liate Stehlik has taken over as SVP, Publisher of Morrow/Eos/Avon, and will continue to oversee Avon and Harper mass market titles.

Collins Reference remains under Bruce Nichols, VP, Publisher of Collins Reference, who now also serves as Executive Editor at Harper. He reports to Jonathan Burnham, as do Elisabeth Dyssegaard and Hollis Heimbouch, Executive Editor Adam Bellow, and Senior Editor Ben Loehnen.

Cecilia Molinari, Editor and ME at Rayo/HarperCollins, can be reached at ceci.freelance [at] gmail.com.

Richard Nash is leaving Counterpoint, where he was Executive Editor, as well as Editorial Director of Soft Skull Press, on March 10. CEO Charlie Winton stated that the company will maintain the Soft Skull imprint and an editorial office in New York. According to Nash’s farewell Tweet: “Hey y’all, my new Twitter name is r_nash. Also www.rnash.com about to go live, and rnash [at] rnash.com already live.”

Gene Mydlowski, former SVP and Creative Director for RHPG, may be reached at gmydlowski [at] gmail.com.

Joanna Pinsker, Associate Director of Publicity at Broadway Books/Random House, may be reached at joannap98 [at] gmail.com. Bruce Tracy, who left Villard earlier this year, may be reached at brucetracy247 [at] gmail.com. Julee Schwarzburg, former Senior Fiction Editor for WaterBrook Multnomah, may be reached at jks8823 [at] aol.com. Jeff Boison, Director of Sales for the Random House Audio Publishing Group, has also left the company, and may be reached at jboison [at] verizon.net.

Robin Noonan, former National Account Manager at S&S, may be reached at robinnoonan [at] comcast.net.

Mike Katz, former VP of Buying & Inventory management for BN.com, may be reached at mkatz50 [at] yahoo.com.

Peter Prescott, Senior Editor for Life Sciences at Oxford University Press, has been laid off, along with four others in the science edit/marketing department. He may be reached at peterjprescott [at] gmail.com.

Diane Otey, former National Account Manager for the MBI/Quayside Publishing Group, has been laid off and may be reached at doteyster [at] gmail.com.

Susan Hecht, former Associate Director of Retail Marketing at Macmillan’s Roaring Brook Press, may be reached at s1hecht [at] aol.com.

Mark Yarnell, former Product Manager for Levy Home Entertainment, may be reached at mly773 [at] rcn.com.

Paul Von Drasek, former Director of Field Sales at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, may be reached at pvondrasek [at] nyc.rr.com. Ellen Higgins Sugg, former National Accounts Manager with Mass Merchant Accounts at HMH, may be reached at e.sugg [at] comcast.net.

Karin Taylor, Executive Director of the New York Center for Independent Publishing, has left and may be reached at karintaylor4444 [at] gmail.com. Leah Schnelbach, Assistant Director of the NYCIP, will serve as Interim Director.

Rodale Books has eliminated four jobs in its book group as part of a “realignment” of resources. Among those laid off was VP of Publicity Beth Davey.

PROMOTIONS AND INTERNAL CHANGES

Laura Stickney has been promoted to Editor at the Penguin Press. Stickney joined Penguin in 2006 from OUP.

Steve Rubin has a new position as EVP and Publisher at Large of Random House, reporting to Markus Dohle.

At Sterling, Kate Rados has been named Director of Digital Markets. Ron Davis has been named VP, Special and International Sales, Digital and Gift. Anne Rogers has been named Director of Special Markets.

Waterfront Media, publisher of SouthbeachDiet.com and EverydayHealth.com, laid off twenty-two people in February.

At Perseus Book Group’s Da Capo Press, Katie McHugh has been promoted to Executive Editor. She had earlier been an editor at Avalon, which was acquired by Perseus in 2007.

DULY NOTED

March is Small Press Month. Take a look at http://www.smallpressmonth.org/events to see what is happening around the country.

March 8–14 is “Read an Ebook Week.” Go to www.ebookweek.com to learn how to celebrate.

Three self-described “history guys,” Peter Onuf (18th-Century Guy) and Brian Balogh (20th-Century Guy), historians at the University of Virginia, and Ed Ayers (19th-Century Guy), President of the University of Richmond and also a historian, have a radio show that gives listeners background to stories in the news and a chance to discuss the implications with the “guys.” The three have written or edited 25 books between them. BackStory is broadcast on various NPR stations and is available as a podcast. Go to www.backstoryradio.org.

IN MEMORIAM

Jean Srnecz, SVP of Merchandising at Baker & Taylor, was among those who died in the crash of Continental flight 3407 on February 12. Memorial contributions may be made to the following organizations: Susan G. Komen for the Cure, 5005 LBJ Freeway, Suite 250, Dallas, TX 75244, or Mortel Family Charitable Foundation, PO Box 405, Hershey, PA 17033.

Chelsea Green’s Twitter Success Story

@ChelseaGreen Has 2,350 Followers. Here’s Why.

by Jesse McDougall, Web Editor, Chelsea Green

Other book publishers often ask me, “How do we market our books on Twitter?” My answer: “You don’t.”

The fastest route to failing on Twitter is to view it as a marketing channel. Twitter is not a platform, a social network, or a website for businesses to plaster with advertisements. It is a world, populated by real people. If your offerings are authentic and interesting, you’ll be rewarded with retweets and new followers. If your offerings are not offerings at all, but one-way, top-down, controlled-message requests for money, action, time, etc., you’ll be ignored.

At Chelsea Green, we don’t use (and don’t want to use) Twitter to market our books. Instead, we use it to interact with our community, learn about our audience, and add what we can to the ongoing discussions about our niche, sustainable living. We use Twitter to…

  1. Learn from the Community. The main thing we do on Twitter is listen. We learn a great deal about community mood, upcoming trends, interesting news, and influential people. We find and vet possible book topics all day long.
  2. Network. Through Twitter, we’ve been able to meet and interact with some of the top green editors and writers in the world. (Hi all!) We meet knowledgeable folks from magazines, blogs, TV shows, other publishing houses, and radio. It’s also a great way to search for future authors.
  3. Get Feedback. Twitter gives us instantaneous feedback from our followers. If we’re waffling on what to title a book, we can log onto Twitter and just ask its likely audience.
  4. Have Fun. In our “Ask the Expert” question series, we invite our followers to submit questions to our authors. We select one to pass on to the author. We post the question’s answer on our blog and send the questioner a free copy of the author’s latest book. This gets authors involved, connects readers to our online community, and gets our books out into the world.

    We also run a contest every Wednesday at 3 PM EST. Each of our books’ website pages has a “Tweet this Book!” link, so our visitors have an easy way to send out a pre-formatted book recommendation to their followers on Twitter. During the contest, we invite our Twitter community to come to our site, browse for a book they’d like to win, and then send the recommendation out to their followers. We track the responses and the tenth person to send a recommendation wins the book they’ve recommended. It’s very straightforward, but a lot of fun. We’re able to reach 14,000+ people in four minutes. Through our interactions on Twitter we receive about 1,000 new visitors to our web site each week. This is a nice benefit of our discussions with the folks on Twitter. When we offer quality content that’s pertinent to the current discussion, people forward it around.

Our website traffic is up 100% over this month last year, and online sales across all our channels were up 35% in 2008. Our growth in sales, site traffic, and audience is not the result of a newfangled social media marketing tactic. It is the result of meeting like-minded folks. Twitter has allowed us to establish Chelsea Green as a community source for quality content.

Translated Literature

Of the nearly 200,000 books published in the United States each year, about 3% are translated. When you consider the category of literary fiction and poetry, that number shrinks to about 0.7%. That sliver of a pie graph was firmly placed in the back of Chad Post’s mind when he joined the University of Rochester to help them develop their new literary imprint in 2006. The imprint, Open Letter, manages to be a press started by a university that is not quite a university press. It publishes twelve translated fiction titles a year, with funding from grants, donations, and the university.

“We are a cross between a nonprofit and a university press, the main difference being that we wanted something much broader than a scholarly or academic library,” Post says. “The University of Rochester hired me with the specific intent of creating a press, and at that point it was unclear what it would look like, but I was hired as the director of this imaginary press.”

That same year, Rochester initiated an academic program for literary translation, which works in collaboration with Open Letter. The program accepts a range of undergraduate and graduate students with advanced study in another language, who are majoring in English or World Literature and related areas, and gives them the opportunity to earn an additional Certificate Degree in Literary Translation. An MA in Literary Translation is currently in the final stages of approval and should become official in the coming months.

According to Thomas DiPiero, Senior Associate Dean of Humanities and a member of Open Letter’s executive committee, participants enter the program with distinct but overlapping career interests in literary translation and international publishing. They leave with advanced knowledge and unique insight into what it takes to translate and publish a title. “We have them think from the very beginning, in the broadest possible way, about the art of translation,” says DiPiero. “It is a vast and complicated field of translating ideas and cultural values at the same time, not a comparatively simple practice that Google can do.”

For Post and the university, they are producing a group of people with a type of training that does not usually exist in literary translation. The courses emphasize writing and literature and include an independent study for which students must translate a piece of literature of their choice. The students hold internships with Open Letter or with publishers in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, and Spain. For those interested in the publishing industry, the experience working at a small press combined with foreign and cultural studies makes them uniquely qualified to work in foreign and subsidiary rights. Although there are other teaching programs like the Center for the Art of Literary Translation’s program for elementary and middle school children, the University of Rochester’s is the first of its kind.

Rhea Lyons, currently working in subsidiary rights at Random House, was the first person to join the translation program and is its first official graduate. “I was one of two Translation Interns at the press, and my job included reading books in Spanish and writing reader’s reports recommending whether or not the book was Open Letter–caliber,” says Lyons. One of the books she read and recommended while interning at the press, Macedonio Fernandez’s Museo de la Novela de la Eterna, will be published by Open Letter in Fall 2009.

Esther Allen, a literary translator who heads Columbia’s Center for Literary Translation and is on the translation committee for the PEN American Center, believes the University of Rochester’s program could be the first step toward changing both the way books are translated and the way translators themselves are viewed. “What Chad and I are talking about is a different order of things,” she says. “It is a translator with an artistic vision bringing a text that they have chosen, that they care about. It is the synthesizing of two cultures.”

The PEN program seeks translators who have chosen texts for translations and offers grants of $2,000–$3,000 towards the work. Of the 30 applicants Allen recently reviewed, only four or five had any professional training as translators. “There were many grad students, a Pilates instructor, an interpreter, a magazine editor in Beijing, a language teacher, freelancers, and one person who said only that he was a member of a Swedish translation society,” says Allen.

The lack of training means translation is difficult to turn into an actual career. Allen points out that the majority of writers don’t earn a living, and translation is even less lucrative. But writers often have other ways of making money, such as reading at universities. “Translators get lost in the cracks. The academic world doesn’t see it as scholarly,” Allen says. But with an academic program geared toward training literary translators and a university press allowing students to see the publishing perspective, the University of Rochester could be on the way to changing that viewpoint.

Similar to European publishing houses that concentrate on translated literature, Archipelago Books, Europa Editions, and Open Letter see themselves as filling a void in an industry that generally shies away from translated fiction. They do it for the passion of taking up a category that is otherwise ignored.

Jill Schoolman, Editor and Publisher of Archipelago, says that it has become ingrained in the heads of U.S. publishers that translated fiction, no matter the quality or potential marketability, just won’t sell. “It is more of a myth than a truth that translations don’t sell,” says Schoolman. “The gatekeepers shouldn’t be afraid of it. If everything is done right, the book will sell.”

And certainly there are such examples as Stieg Larsson, Paulo Coelho, Carlos Ruiz Zafón, and any of the Nobel Laureates, from Naguib Mahfouz in 1988 to Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio twenty years later.

Grove/Atlantic publishes about six to eight works in translation a year, according to Morgan Entrekin, President and Publisher. Entrekin says that the company is not slowing down; if anything, it is increasing the number of translations it does. Agents abroad with successful titles are beginning to translate somewhere around 30 to 100 pages into English in order to sell foreign rights. That can lessen the unease of signing a foreign title without the chance to read it in full. “It’s a challenge. You listen to your friends, you get readers reports, but there is always a bit of guesswork,” says Entrekin. “Wetlands [the globally bestselling sexy German novel by Charlotte Roche] was a very tricky one to figure out—some were horrified.”

Nonprofit publishers like Open Letter and Archipelago often have no choice when it comes to marketing their books. The grants from organizations like PEN America, the National Endowment for the Arts, and the New York State Council for the Arts (before it had its funds frozen and had to revoke grants) have specific rules how the money can be spent, and marketing is not generally covered.

Kent Carroll, Publisher of Europa Editions, where about two-thirds of the titles published are translated, agrees that a bias against translation exists, but says, “Most of the best books find their way into the English language at some point. Authors complain that they can’t get an agent, but agents are looking for good authors too and the same goes for good books.”

Disappearing professional book review coverage is being replaced by bloggers. When Chad Post first started a blog for Open Letter, it was more of a place for students to write reviews of foreign titles they read than a marketing tool, and Post has tried to stay true to that idea. The blog’s name, Three Percent, recognizes the tiny number of translated books published in the U.S.

Besides reviews, Three Percent covers and comments on news on translated titles. It recently made some news of its own when Open Letter teamed up with Melville House to select the best translated fiction and best translated poetry of 2008. Eight judges chose 10 works of poetry and 10 works of fiction to be shortlisted for the prize, before announcing the winner on February 19 at an event hosted by author and critic Francisco Goldman at Melville House’s bookstore. This year’s winner for best translated fiction is For the Fighting Spirit of the Walnut by Takashi Hiraide, published by New Directions and translated from the Japanese by Sawako Nakayasu. For best translated poetry,
Archipelago’s Tranquility, written by Attila Bartis and translated from the Hungarian by Imre Goldstein, took home the prize.

Harold Augenbraum, Executive Director of the National Book Foundation, says Open Letter and Three Percent are major steps toward coordinating and synchronizing the world of translated literature. “America has been criticized across the board for a lack of translated word, but it is not a cultural deficiency. We actually have our own diverse culture with a first generation of immigrants,” says Augenbraum. “And there is certainly a movement afoot among literary people to pick up the slack.”

Publishers and Twitter

The feature article in our March issue will be about how book publishers can use Twitter–which, as Chris Brogan says, is an increasingly important business tool. We would love to include input from blog readers in the article. Let us know your thoughts in the comments, via e-mail, or, of course, on Twitter.

Do you and/or your company use Twitter?
If you do, what has your experience been like?
If you don’t use Twitter, why not?
How do you think book publishers should be using Twitter? Do you follow any book publishers on Twitter? Whose Tweets do you like, and why?
Any great Twitter business stories to share?

5 Things We Learned About Teens at TOC

At TOC on Wednesday afternoon, we attended “Youth and Creativity: Emerging Trends in Self-expression and Publishing,” a session by Evangeline Haughney (Adobe) and Bill Westerman (Create with Context). They hung out with real teenagers in their homes to get a look at their creative processes. When choosing which teens to follow, they looked for those who were creative, but not necessarily planning to go into art or design after high school. They picked those who were involved in interesting self-expression activities and who were creating digital media to share with others outside their immediate circles of friends. Here are five not-so-obvious takeaways (beyond the fairly apparent “Teens want to create identities for themselves online” and “In general, teens are pretty tech-savvy”). (The panel didn’t focus much on book publishing, but it provides useful background to YA publishers who want a better look at what their target audiences are doing online.)

  • Teens don’t see buying a software program (like Adobe Photoshop) as a major “life event.” Whereas people in their twenties and thirties may sign up for classes and buy instruction manuals after purchasing a program, teens churn through many different technologies quickly, using programs only for what they need and then moving on.
  • At the same time, teens feel as if they have mastered these programs. Westerman pointed out that when he asks an adult, professional Photoshop user if she knows everything there is to know about Photoshop, that adult will usually answer, “No, I haven’t even scratched the surface.” Teens, on the other hand, will answer, “Yeah, I know Photoshop.” Nor are they concerned that they haven’t learned all the “right” ways of doing things with a program–they’re concentrated on the outcome, not the tool. They don’t ask, “How do I use the masking tool?” They ask, “How can I create a cool rain effect?”
  • That’s not to say that teens aren’t asking for help. They are! But they’re going to their peers online or typing queries into Google. There’s a return of the “apprenticeship”–teens learning skills from their more knowledgable peers, actively seeking critiques of their work, and really adopting a craft mentality. Learning is a process of watching and doing on the fly. “There’s no more learning curve,” Westerman said.
  • Any niche site can become a social hub–teens aren’t just using Facebook for social networking. One subject in the study, “David,” spent most of his time on the “Silverfish Longboarding” discussion boards. (A longboard is a type of skateboard.) These microcommunities give teens, who tend to define themselves through 2 or 3 major interests when creating online personas, a sense of belonging.
  • Teens aren’t using the fanciest, newest technology. Most of those surveyed had fairly old computers and older versions of software. They were making do with what they had. And they were not pirating software. One teen, “Gina,” bought a copy of Adobe Photoshop with her friend at Costco, and the girls took turns using it at home, since they only had one license.

Haughney said that future studies will target teens who DO plan to enter the design field after graduation, since the ways they are using technology now may have a major effect on the field–and on how software is designed.

TOC: The Narrative Is Changing

On the final day of TOC, Tim O’Reilly gave his keynote, following on the heels of the inventive Nick Bilton from the NYT’s R&D labs. (Bilton created the interactive website for David Carr’s book.) Much of what he discussed was focused on the topic that was subsequently addressed at the next session, where a group assembled to address the big issue: The Changing Role of the Publisher. Not surprisingly, given TOC’s pursuit of the future, the only traditional publishers were Michael Hyatt from Thomas Nelson and O’Reilly himself. And even these two would hardly be considered traditional in any other setting.

All the participants argued for greater interplay between author, reader, and publisher. Eileen Gittins of Blurb.com claimed that the company doesn’t publish, but rather goes after “folks who’ve got stuff” that they want to share. With triple digit growth since its founding, “we’ve tacked to that part of the slipstreams and found a goldmine,” she announced. There is also an ongoing effort to get the community of folks all over the world who have money but don’t know how to publish together with those who have skills but no money: BlurbNation. Ultimately, this cross-promotion “amplifies word of mouth.” In an ambitious demonstration of that idea, Blurb worked with flickr and the Tate Modern to create a participatory show of street photography. Tate curated the work that came out of it into a book, which Blurb sold. To celebrate the participatory event, the Tate threw a party for 5,000 people.

Lulu.com’s Bob Young basically said he planned to follow Blurb’s lead, but meanwhile he also is seeing an uptick in revenues and titles published–5,000 a week. He surmised that there has been a huge increase in people who meant to write a book and are now unemployed, so have the time. Clint Greenleaf of the Greenleaf Book Group argued that to break out of the pack, the author must create a platform, but that the credibility of work is what counts.

Like all the participants, Thomas Nelson’s Michael Hyatt Twitters, because it draws attention to what is going on at the company, and creates specialist blogs that often highlight books. A recent innovation is a book review bloggers site that allows serious reviewers to get review books.

Tim O’Reilly, who published his wife’s play on Lulu, talked of the Lulu and Blurb models as publishing as a social act–a chance to share an experience. These publishers offer a combination of social networking and the creation/curation/production of books. The book is, in the Lulu sense of publishing, “a souvenir of that shared activity.” But there is much traditional publishers can learn from it. Earlier he had talked about O’Reilly’s “Rough Cut” initiative, a peer review program whose books are getting 2.5 times the revenue of books that weren’t in the program. As he said earlier, but could have reiterated to sum up the discussion, “Participation drives revenue.”

Factoid from Nick Bilton: The number of links on the Huffington Post alone in one day is 657. Multiplied by the average media consumer’s grazing, that’s 162,000 possible links in a day. “Our social networks are becoming paths to social aggregation–swarm intelligence to disseminate content flow.”

10 Things We Learned from Chris Brogan at TOC

Yesterday, PT attended Chris Brogan’s “Blogging and Social Media” tutorial at Tools of Change for Publishing 2009. Brogan is a social media/community-building super blogger–check him out here. His panel wasn’t a lecture or traditional speech; rather, it was a conversation with the audience. He jumped from topic to topic; showed us his Facebook, Google Reader, and Twitter pages; played his friends’ YouTube clips and book trailers; and took questions throughout. Here are ten takeaways:

  1. Focus on grabbing your customers’ attention and keeping it. Don’t get too upset over the fact that people’s attention spans are short. “We don’t have time for Moby Dick,” says Brogan. “It’s at once depressing and a reality.”
  2. Twitter is THE social media tool publishers should learn how to use. (If you keep hearing about Twitter but have no idea what it is, don’t worry–it will be the topic of the feature article in the March issue of PT!) Many people in the audience were Tweeting throughout the panel, and when someone asked a question about book social networking sites, Brogan Tweeted the question to his followers and got many answers within a few seconds.
  3. Twitter is a better marketing tool than MySpace or Facebook because it allows users to develop genuine relationships with each other. Brogan described most MySpace and Facebook marketing as being much too pushy and impersonal: “If I’m using my hand to shake your hand, don’t put your tongue in my mouth.”
  4. How should publishers (and others) decide which social networking sites to use? Brogan recommends they find out where their customers are, and go there. And it’s better to be very involved with them on one site than to do a lackluster job of being everywhere: “If you’re going to be everywhere,” Brogan said, “you have to answer the phone and you have to offer customer service everywhere.”
  5. Try putting your slush pile online! What a great way to find out what readers would be interested in before you publish it.
  6. Want to try something new? Don’t look to other book publishers for ideas, Brogan says. Instead, “Why not rip off people in other verticals? Can you adapt it to what you’re doing?” Take a look at Viddler, for instance–it’s like YouTube, but lets users comment on and tag specific parts of a video.
  7. Segregate your list! Forget the “Here’s everything we’re publishing” e-mail blast. If you’re a publisher, nobody is interested in ALL your books. You can use technology to splice your lists and target specific people with only the ones they’ll be interested in. To help you do this, check out BatchBook.
  8. It’s all about the fans. “It is always awesome when the would-be famous person celebrates the audience, rather than the other way around,” says Brogan. “That never goes out of style.”
  9. A quality blog is always trying to interact, rather than just delivering or pushing content. “You are hoping to inspire some level of two-way,” Brogan says, even if it’s not on the blog. Seth Godin, for example, doesn’t allow comments on his blog. He’d rather have readers write their own ideas on their own blogs and link back to him.
  10. Books are a distribution problem. “Think of solutions that are not so DRM-ful,” he says to publishers–i.e., don’t focus on protecting your content from people who would want to read it. “You will not lose all money,” he says. “You will lose some money. But you lose money every time you release a book. It’s called marketing.”